New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1911

State v. Cubberly

State v. Cubberly
New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Decided May 4, 1911 · Woolley
26 Del. 100; 3 Boyce 100; 80 A. 1003; 1911 Del. LEXIS 17

Counsel

Eugene Hardesty for the state., Richard S. Rodney for the defendant.

State v. Cubberly

Opinion of the Court

Woolley, J.,

charging the jury:

[1] Gentlemen of the jury:—The offense for which this defendant is indicted is not a statutory offense in this state, but it is an offense that had its origin at common law. It possesses several elements which must be proven to secure a conviction, the principal one being the element of malice. In every trespass that amounts to malicious mischief, there must be malice of a certain character, that is, a certain malignity, which, when it inspires mischief, results in damage to the community or tends to a breach of the peace.

[2] We are convinced, from the testimony produced by the state, that this is not a case of malicious mischief; that at most it is a case of private trespass, for which the prosecutrix has her remedy against the defendant in a civil action. Therefore we think that the defendant should not be called upon to defend in a matter in which the state has not proven the elements of the crime *102charged against him. We therefore direct you and bind you to return a vérdict of not guilty.

Verdict, not guilty.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.