City of New York Municipal Court, 1886

Seitz v. Berg

Seitz v. Berg
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided May 15, 1886 · McAdam
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 294
Seitz v. Berg

Opinion of the Court

McAdam, Ch. J.

The action is for “ breach of a promise to marry,” and seduction is pleaded in aggravation of damages only (8 Barb. 323; 30 N. Y. 285). The *295only civil action which can be founded on “ seduction” is by the parent or other person entitled to the female’s services to recover for them loss (26 Barb. 615; 11 N. Y. 343). The present action is not so brought, and is not for seduction in the sense in which that term is used in subdivision 3 of section 3228, of the Code in regard to costs. The recovery herein for the breach of promise being less than $50, it follows that that the defendant is entitled to a full bill of costs (Code, § 3228, § 3229, subd. 4).

Re-taxation ordered in accordance herewith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.