City of New York Municipal Court, 1888

Brown v. Motteler

Brown v. Motteler
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided May 15, 1888 · McAdam
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 439
Brown v. Motteler

Opinion of the Court

McAdam, Ch. J.

The provision of the Code (§ 1814) declaring that an action by an executor, or administrator, “ upon a cause of action belonging to him in his representative capacity” must be brought by him in that capacity, includes only such causes of. action as accrued *440during the lifetime of the decedent, or are founded on a contract made by him (Buckland v. Gallup, 105 N. Y. 453. See cases cited in Mayo v. Austin, 2 City Ct. 113). An action upon a demand accruing to the personal representative, through a disposition of the funds or property of the estate after the decease of the testator or intestate, may be brought by him in his individual capacity (lb.).

The word “ executor ” in the title of the action may be regarded as surplusage (45 N. Y. Super. Ct. 517; 1 Hun, 49; aff’d, 58 N. Y. 621; 2 City Ct. 113). The plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to judgment on the demurrer, with costs, and with leave to the defendant to withdraw the demurrer, and answer over on payment, within three days, of $20, the trial fee of an issue of law.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.