City of New York Municipal Court, 1890

Heath v. Forbes

Heath v. Forbes
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided February 13, 1890 · McAdam
11 N.Y.S. 87; 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 617 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Albert H. Atterbury, for plaintiff, P. P. Pope, for defendant.

Heath v. Forbes

Opinion of the Court

McAdam, C. J.

The clerk properly refused to tax the defendant’s costs. See Cooper v. Jolly, 30 Hun, 224, affirmed, 96 N. Y. 667; Briggs v. Allen, 4 Hill, 538; Williard v. Strachan, 3 Civil Proc. R. 452; Crosley v. Cobb, 42 Hun, 167; Reed v. Batten, 6 N. Y. Supp. 708,—which must prevail against the case reported in 41 Hun, 249, (Blashfield v. Blashfield.) The rule as settled seems to be that to entitle a defendant to costs in a case where he succeeds as to one of several causes of action, nothing short of a specific verdict in his favor as to such cause of action will suffice. Action of clerk affirmed. See Durant v. Abendroth, 13 Civil Proc. R. 434.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.