City of New York Municipal Court, 1892

Goldenson v. Lawrence

Goldenson v. Lawrence
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1892 · Ehrlich
1 Misc. 1; 20 N.Y.S. 616; 48 N.Y. St. Rep. 636

Counsel

Goodrich, Deady & Goodrich, for defendants (appellants)., David Leventritt, for plaintiff (respondent).

Goldenson v. Lawrence

Opinion of the Court

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The court below, on granting leave to amend, had the power to impose such terms as it deemed just (Code, § 723), and'the terms imposed can hardly be called an abuse of discretion; besides the order recites that it was made with consent of the parties. This recital concludes the parties on appeal. Smith v. Grant, 11 Civ. Proc. Rep. 354.

Under the circumstances, the order appealed from must be affirmed with costs.

Van Wyck and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.