City of New York Municipal Court, 1892

Goldenson v. Lawrence

Goldenson v. Lawrence
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1892 · Ehrlich
1 Misc. 2; 48 N.Y. St. Rep. 636

Counsel

Goodrich, Deady & Goodrich, for defendants (appellants)., Demid leventritt, for plaintiff (respondent).

Goldenson v. Lawrence

Opinion of the Court

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

Where the facts are undisputed, the court on appeal may direct the resettlement of a case or order to conform to the facts. New York, Rubber Co. v. Rothery, 112 N. Y. 592; Second Appeal, 119 id. 633; Gleason v. Smith, 34 Hun, 547; Healey v. Terry, 26 N. Y. St. Repr. 929.

But here the facts are disputed. The certificate of the judge as to what occurred before him must be accepted as conclusive. Green v. Shute, 26 N. Y. St. Repr. 114; Healey v. Terry, 26 id. 929. This rule applies to the present contention (Smith v. Grant, 11 Civ. Proc. Rep. 354), and requires that the order appealed from must be affirmed with costs.

Van Wyck and McCarthy, JJ, concur.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.