City of New York Municipal Court, 1892

Goldenson v. Lawrence

Goldenson v. Lawrence
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 24, 1892 · Ehrlich
20 N.Y.S. 616 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Goodrich, Deady & Goodrich, for appellants. David Leventritt, for respondent.

Goldenson v. Lawrence

Opinion of the Court

Ehrlich, C. J.

Where the facts are undisputed, the court, on appeal, may direct the resettlement of a case or order to conform to the facts. Rubber Co. v. Rothery, 112 N. Y. 592, 30 N. E. Rep. 546, on appeal 119 N. Y. 633, 23 N. E. Rep. 529; Gleason v. Smith, 34 Hun, 547; Healey v. Terry, (City Ct. N. Y.) 7 N. Y. Supp. 321. But here the facts are disputed. The certificate of the judge as to what occurred before him must be accepted as conclusive. Green v. Shute, (City Ct. N. Y.) 7 N. Y. Supp. 69; Healey v. Terry, supra. The rule applies to the present contention, (Smith v. Grant, 11 Civil Proc. R. 354,) and requires that the order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.