City of New York Municipal Court, 1893

Claflin v. New York Standard Watch Co.

Claflin v. New York Standard Watch Co.
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided July 1, 1893 · Ehrlich
3 Misc. 629

Counsel

Oha/rles W. QouM, for plaintiffs (appellants)., John W. Weed, for defendant (respondent).

Claflin v. New York Standard Watch Co.

Opinion of the Court

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The case seems to have been carefully tried, and the result arrived at warranted by the evidence.

The counsel had the right to refer to the pleadings during the progress of the trial, as they are always before the court and jury. Rowe v. Comley, 1 City Ct. Rep. 466; 2 Civ. Proc. Rep. 424, 427.

We have examined the numerous exceptions and find them without merit.

On the facts as found by the jury, the verdict rendered by them is right, and the judgment entered thereon and the order denying the motion for a new trial must be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons and Newburger, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.