City of New York Municipal Court, 1893

Lorzing v. Eisenberg

Lorzing v. Eisenberg
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided July 1, 1893 · McCarthy
5 Misc. 590

Counsel

W. H. Regan, for plaintiff (respondent)., Fromme Bros., for defendants (appellants).

Lorzing v. Eisenberg

Opinion of the Court

McCarthy, J.

Having determined in the action of Lorzing v. Eisenberg, ante, page 358, on the appeal from the order denying the motion to open the default to reverse said *591order, as matter of course this judgment falls. But this is without fault of the respondent.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed, and a new trial ordered; no costs.

Fitzsimons, J., concurs.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.