City of New York Municipal Court, 1893

Dearing v. Pearson

Dearing v. Pearson
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided November 15, 1893 · Newburger
6 Misc. 617; 26 N.Y.S. 74; 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 774

Counsel

Smith, Bowman & Close, for defendant (appellant)., David Leventritt, for plaintiff (respondent).

Dearing v. Pearson

Opinion of the Court

Newburger, J.

This is an appeal from an order made by the trial justice herein, denying the defendant’s motion for a resettlement of a proposed amendment to the case on appeal from the judgment.

This court has held in Green v. Shute, 26 N. Y. St. Repr. 114, that the action of the trial justice in settling a case on appeal cannot be reviewed where there is a dispute as to the facts.

In this , case it appears that there were a number of conflicting affidavits as to the facts, and the trial justice determined it.

The order must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck and McCarthy, JJ., coñete.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.