City of New York Municipal Court, 1893

Haines v. Thompson

Haines v. Thompson
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided December 15, 1893 · McCarthy
6 Misc. 622; 26 N.Y.S. 1135

Counsel

Browne & Sheehan, for defendants (appellants)., Dittenhoefer, Gerber & James, for plaintiff (respondent).

Haines v. Thompson

Opinion of the Court

McCarthy, J.

We have examined the evidence very carefully and find no errors.

It involved a question of fact which was properly and fairly presented to the jury by the trial justice.

The jury found for the plaintiff and there was sufficient evidence upon which to base their verdict.

Judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs. .

■Ehrlich, Oh. J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.