Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
City of New York Municipal Court, 1893

Lorzing v. Eisenberg

Lorzing v. Eisenberg
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 20, 1893 · McCarthy
25 N.Y.S. 752; 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 512 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Fromme Bros., for appellants., William H. Regan, for respondent.

Lorzing v. Eisenberg

Opinion of the Court

MCCARTHY, J.

Having determined in the action of Lorzing v. Eisenberg, 25 N. Y. Supp. 750, on the appeal from the order denying the motion to open the default, to reverse said order, as matter of course, this judgment falls. But this is without fault of the respondent The judgment is therefore reversed, ■and a new trial ordered. No costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.