City of New York Municipal Court, 1893

Campbell v. Jimenes

Campbell v. Jimenes
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 20, 1893 · Newburger
25 N.Y.S. 1143 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Tracy, Boardman & Platt, for appellants., William F. Randel, for respondent.

Campbell v. Jimenes

Opinion of the Court

NEWBURGER, J.

Our appellate court having held (Campbell v. Jimenes, 23 N. Y. Supp. 333) that the terms of the contract between plaintiff and defendants were ambiguous, and that the meaning of the instrument can only be determined by a jury, the trial justice therefore properly denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss. There appears to be no other exception in the case of merit, and judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.