City of New York Municipal Court, 1894

Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein

Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided January 15, 1894 · McCarthy
6 Misc. 629; 27 N.Y.S. 136; 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 903

Counsel

George Hahn, for defendant (appellant)., Alfred & Charles Steckler, for plaintiff (respondent).

Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein

Opinion of the Court

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for the examination of the plaintiff before trial. The papers used on the motion present a proper case for the exercise of judicial discretion. In the absence of abuse in the use of this discretion we cannot interfere. There was none here, and the order must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Eewburgbr, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.