City of New York Municipal Court, 1894

Carlson v. Winterson

City of New York Municipal Court · Decided July 1, 1894 · Newburger

9 Misc. 711; 29 N.Y.S. 1142; 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 878

Counsel

H. M. Hitchings, for respondent., E. F. Bullard, for appellant.

Opinion of the Court

Newburger, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered, upon a verdict.

This action is on a promissory note, and the defense is. forgery.

A careful examination of the printed case fails to disclose any errors on the part of the trial justice in the exclusion of *712certain questions asked by appellant’s counsel, and as these seem to be the only grounds upon which this appeal has been taken, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.