City of New York Municipal Court, 1894

Nagel v. Adler

City of New York Municipal Court · Decided July 1, 1894 · McCabthy

10 Misc. 787

Counsel

Philip J. Britt, for appellants., Chandes L. Hubbell, for respondent.

McCabthy, J.

This trial involved a question of fact which was fairly submitted under proper instructions.

*788The jury having found on the facts against the defendants and on conflicting evidence we see no reason to disturb the same.

J udgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Ehblioh, Oh. J., and Van Wyck, J., concur.

■ Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.