City of New York Municipal Court, 1894

Keteltas v. Gilmour

City of New York Municipal Court · Decided July 1, 1894 · McCarthy

10 Misc. 788

Counsel

P. Q. <& F. L. Eckerson, for appellants., Edward P. Schell, for respondent.

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from an order directing the defendant to serve a bill of particulars of the counterclaim set forth in his answer. ,

I think the same was within the sound discretion of the court and was properly allowed.

The order is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.