City of New York Municipal Court, 1894

Hertz v. Minzesheimer

Hertz v. Minzesheimer
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 23, 1894 · Ehrlich
30 N.Y.S. 805; 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 767 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Joel M. Marx, for appellant., Langbein Bros. & Langbein, for respondent.

Hertz v. Minzesheimer

Opinion of the Court

EHRLICH, C. J.

The action was for brokerage, and the contention narrowed down to the question whether the defendant was to pay the plaintiff $500, or one-half of 1 per cent, of the price received by the defendant, which latter sum, amounting to $157.50, defendant paid to the plaintiff, who received the same, and claimed it to be on account of the $500. The evidence is conflicting, and the jury, under a clear and impartial charge, found for the plaintiff. We find no reason to disturb the verdict, and the judgment entered thereon must be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.