City of New York Municipal Court, 1894

Casey v. Stewart

Casey v. Stewart
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 23, 1894 · Ehrlich
30 N.Y.S. 808; 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 768 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

P. Chauncey Anderson, for appellant., William Erbie, for respondent Stewart., James Flynn, for respondent Payne.

Casey v. Stewart

Opinion of the Court

EHRLICH, C. J.

The action was upon a promissory note made by the Cosmopolitan Club to the order of the plaintiff, and indorsed by the defendants. The note, upon its face, imported that the plaintiff was the payee, and presumptively was to become the first indorser. In order to overcome that presumption, and make the defendants first indorsers, it was necessary to show that they indorsed the note under circumstances which negatived the legal presumption. This he failed to do, and the trial judge properly dismissed the complaint. We find no error requiring a new trial, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.