City of New York Municipal Court, 1894

Thornton v. Winpenny

Thornton v. Winpenny
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided December 17, 1894
31 N.Y.S. 1134; 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 882 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Perkins & Butler, for appellant., Brigham & Bayliss, for respondent.

Thornton v. Winpenny

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The amended exception to the decision of the referee brings up but one question for review. The referee decided that the plaintiff, at the special instance and request of defendant, between the 1st day of May and the 15th of June, 1893, rendered services to the defendant in selling goods, wares, and merchandise for him. To this decision defendant excepted, as against the weight of evidence. We think there was sufficient evidence in the case to warrant the conclusion of the referee, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.