City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Balz v. Shaw

Balz v. Shaw
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided February 15, 1895 · Ehrlich
11 Misc. 444

Counsel

John P. Bchuehman, for appellant., J. W. Fislce, for respondent.

Balz v. Shaw

Opinion of the Court

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The orde.r appealed from having, been made by the trial judge,' we think we must, in view of the facts, accept his certification as conclusive■ thereon. Todo *445otherwise would be to substitute our opinion for his knowledge. There was a dispute as to what occurred, and the -trial judge determined it. Green v. Shute, 7 N. Y. Supp. 69; Dearing v. Pearson, 6 Misc. Rep. 616; 26 N. Y. Supp. 74 ; 8 Misc. Rep. 270 ; 28 N. Y. Supp. 715.

For these reasons the order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Newburger, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.