Barranco v. Towner
Opinion of the Court
We have carefully examined the record in this case,- and are of opinion that the exception's were well-taken. Mr. Levison -stated, on behalf of the plaintiffs : “ I had a conversation with' him,” meaning the defendant, “ at that time, and, as a result of that conversation, I had business-transactions with him. I sold Mr. Towner a bill amounting: to about $985. I did not sell him the same brand that he purchased before; I sold him the same cigars, but a different brand.” Again, Levison testified, on behalf of plaintiffs;' “The goods ordered in October'were similar to the goods ordered in March previous, same cigars, but under a different, label. Q. What- was stated at the time you took the order in-October ? A. When I came into Mr. Towner’s I asked him’, if he wanted any of my cigars any more. He said, ‘Yes, I can use your cigars,’ and then he gave me an order.” The-following question was asked the defendant by his counsel •; “ Q. What conversation did you have with Mr. Levison, the salesman of plaintiff, at the time you gave him the order for the goods in suit?” The question was excluded, on the-ground that the contract was in writing. If the plaintiff’s-counsel relied on the contract contained in the letters, he should not have, examined Levison as to Conversations with
Judgment reversed, order of reference vacated and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. ■
Present: Clement, Ch. J., Van Wyck and Osborne, JJ.
Judgment reversed, order of reference vacated .and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide event.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.