Hafelin v. Silverman
Hafelin v. Silverman
11 Misc. 723; 32 N.Y.S. 918; 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 344
Opinion of the Court
The affidavits on the part of the defendants on the proceedings to rebond the property sufficiently complied with the statute, and the court below had power to allow a new undertaking to bé filed mino joro fame. !
There was, therefore, no abuse of discretion in the court ■below, and the order appealed from, must be affirmed,' with costs. . - ~
Newburger and Vah Wyck, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, ydth costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.