City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Newkirk v. Hooker

Newkirk v. Hooker
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided April 15, 1895 · McCarthy
12 Misc. 198; 33 N.Y.S. 1131; 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 872

Counsel

Johnson do Dowd, for appellants., Abraham Kling, for respondent.

Newkirk v. Hooker

Opinion of the Court

McCarthy, J.

The defendant, by movmg on the original โ€™ papers to vacate the attachment, concedes all that is stated in the affidavits and their legal intendment.

Section 636, Code of Civil Procedure, does not apply to this court (See ยง 3160, Code Civ. Proc.), but section 3169 does.

We think the affidavits, although not as full as they might be, are sufficient to sustain this attachment.

Order is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., and Van Wyck, J., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.