Dunn v. Wehle
Dunn v. Wehle
12 Misc. 653
Opinion of the Court
It seems to me clear that the want of jurisdiction in this case appears on the face of the complaint.
Before the plaintiff can claim any money judgment he must apply to a court of equity, as appears by the demand of the complaint for judgment, to wit: “ First, that the alleged assignment aforesaid be declared fraudulent and void and of no effect, and that the same be set aside.”
The court has no power to grant such relief, and the order to discontinue without costs was properly allowed.
Order is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.
Van Wyck, J., concurs.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.