City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Freudenheim v. Raduziner

Freudenheim v. Raduziner
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided July 1, 1895 · Oonlan
12 Misc. 654

Counsel

Edouard Clark, for appellants., A. H. Berrick, for respondent.

Freudenheim v. Raduziner

Opinion of the Court

Oonlan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict by direction of the court and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed on former opinion of this court. See Freudenheim v. Raduziner, 10 Misc. Rep. 500; 81 N. Y. Supp. 194.

Fitzsimons and Newbubger, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.