City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Groff v. Hagan

Groff v. Hagan
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided June 15, 1895 · Newburger
13 Misc. 322

Counsel

Ezekiel Fixman, for appellant., A. S. JBurmell, for respondent.

Groff v. Hagan

Opinion of the Court

Newburger, J.

Without considering all the questions raised by the appellant, there is one reason why the order appealed from should be reversed.

The affidavit upon which the order is made is by the attorney for the plaintiff.

It has been repeatedly held that an order for a bill of particulars will not be granted on the affidavit of the attorney. Van Olinda v. Hall, 31 N. Y. Supp. 495; Dueber Co. v. Keystone Co., 21 id. 442; Gridley v. Gridley, 7 Civ. Proc. Rep. 215.

The order appealed from must, therefore, be reversed, with costs.

Conlan, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.