City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Green v. Schroeder

Green v. Schroeder
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided June 15, 1895 · Conlan
13 Misc. 324; 34 N.Y.S. 1140; 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 872

Counsel

Vanderpod, Cuming <& Goodwvn, for appellant., D. J. M. O' Callaghcm, for respondent.

Green v. Schroeder

Opinion of the Court

Conlan, J.

Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer, and from an interlocutory judgment thereon entered.

We think the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the second separate defense in the answer.

Neely, on the trial, will have to show substantial perform-, anee on his part before he or his assignee can recover back the money advanced to Saltus.

Exhibit “A” refers to Exhibit “B,” and Exhibit “B” refers to Exhibit cí A; ” they are inseparable in law, and must be read and construed together.

The judgment and order appealed from must be reversed and demurrer overruled, with costs.

Newburger, J., concurs.

Judgment and order reversed and demurrer overruled, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.