City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Norwood v. Hickok

City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1895 · Fitzsimons

14 Misc. 236; 35 N.Y.S. 713; 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 448

Counsel

Large dh StallTcnecht, "for appellant., ‘ If. 8. Marden, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Fitzsimons, J.

The evidence shows that the defendant received plaintiff’s bill for services, rendered and promised to pay the same when able. That surely establishes plaintiff’s claim that the services in question were rendered and the *237value thereof was satisfactory to defendant, and, inviewof the failure to introduce evidence in her own behalf, justified the trial judge in directing a verdict against her.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

McCarthy, J., concurs.

■ Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.