City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Curtin v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Curtin v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided November 15, 1895 · Conlan
14 Misc. 459; 36 N.Y.S. 1111; 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 260

Counsel

Push Taggart, for appellant., I/yman W. Pedington, for respondent. -

Curtin v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Opinion of the Court

Conlan, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered oh the decision of the court without a jury.

Aside from the question of defendant’s negligence, the damages, found by the trial judge could not have been within the *460contemplation of the parties at the time of sending the dispatch, and are, therefore, iiot the proximate result of-defendant’s. breach of its obligation to transmit promptly.-

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Fitzsimons, J., concurs. ' • 1

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event. ' •

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.