City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Georgi v. Alexe

Georgi v. Alexe
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided July 1, 1895 · Fitzsimous
14 Misc. 657

Counsel

G. B. Ashley j for appellants., George Freifeld, for respondent. ' > '

Georgi v. Alexe

Opinion of the Court

Fitzsimous, J.

The issues presented by the allegation contained in the- “ fii-st defense ” are clear and unmistakable, and if sustained are sufficient to defeat the plaintiff herein.

As to the second defense, so called, in the answer, I am notable to find therein any defense to this cause of action, except-that part of 7th paragraph which alleges “that the notes in suit were procured from defendant without consideration.”

This is simply d repetition of the first defense in substance,, and is, therefore, redundant matter,-and all.the other matters-, set forth are clearly irrelevant to the issue herein and have no> legdl merit, so that the order appealed from was properly-made and is affirmed, with costs.

McCaethy and Cójtlan, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.