City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Balz v. Shaw

Balz v. Shaw
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided February 11, 1895 · Ehrlich
32 N.Y.S. 220; 11 Misc. 444 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John P. Schuchman, for appellant., J. M. Fiske, for respondent.

Balz v. Shaw

Opinion of the Court

EHRLICH, C. J.

The order appealed from having been made by

trial judge, we think we must, in view of the facts, accept his certification as conclusive thereon. To do otherwise would be to substitute our opinion for his knowledge. There was a dispute as to what occurred, and the trial judge determined it. Green v. Shute (City Ct. N. Y.) 7 N. Y. Supp. 69; Dearing v. Pearson (City Ct. N. Y.) 26 N. Y. Supp. 74, affirmed (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 28 N. Y. Supp. 715. For these reasons the order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.