City of New York Municipal Court, 1895

Uptegrove v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey

Uptegrove v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided November 26, 1895 · McCarthy
35 N.Y.S. 1118; 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 896 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

De Forest Bros., for appellant. M. P. O’Connor, for respondents.

Uptegrove v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey

Opinion of the Court

McCARTHY, J.

Both sides, having moved for a direction of a verdict, left the questions of law and fact to the trial justice to determine. We have examined the facts very carefully, and, under Park v. Preston, 108 N. Y. 434, 437, 15 N. E. 705, think the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered, with costs. See Jennings v. Railway Co., 127 N. Y. 449. 28 N. E. 394.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.