City of New York Municipal Court, 1896

Purdy v. Tailer

Purdy v. Tailer
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided January 15, 1896 · McCarthy
15 Misc. 467; 71 N.Y. St. Rep. 871

Counsel

Thomas O'Callaghan, Jr., for appellant., G. E. Gartland, for respondent.

Purdy v. Tailer

Opinion of the Court

McCarthy, J.

In regard to the' formal proof on the admission of the photographs offered in evidence we think no harm was done, since the plaintiff afterwards practically admitted that these photographs were correct and represented only one portion of the building.

*468This was as claimed for by the defendant, and if there was any defect at the time they were offered and admitted in evidence, that was cured by the admission.

The case was fairly and fully presented by both sides on the facts, and the charge of the trial justice was clear and concise, to which no objection was taken.

We find no substantial errors, and, therefore, judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Eotty, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.