City of New York Municipal Court, 1896

Newcombe v. Eagleton

Newcombe v. Eagleton
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided March 15, 1896 · Conlan
16 Misc. 285; 38 N.Y.S. 424; 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 845

Counsel

. Foley & Earley, for appellant., Leo Lithauer, for' respondent.

Newcombe v. Eagleton

Opinion of the Court

Conlan, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered hy direction of the court and from an order denying a motion for' a new trial.

The legal obligation of the defendant as surety on the lease terminated with the issuance of the warrant by the justice.

.The judgment should be reversed and a, new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Fitzsimons and O’Dwyer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.