City of New York Municipal Court, 1896

Steinberg v. Rosenthal

Steinberg v. Rosenthal
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided May 15, 1896 · McCarthy
17 Misc. 53; 39 N.Y.S. 1132; 73 N.Y. St. Rep. 877

Counsel

A. H. Berrick, for appellant., E. Rosenthal, for respondent.

Steinberg v. Rosenthal

Opinion of the Court

McCarthy, J.

This is an appeal from an order allowing plaintiff to sue as a poor person.

. While it is true that the equities may be with the defendant, yet the court having the right-to grant the order, the only question for us to determine is, was there an abuse of judicial discretion?

*54We cannot say that.

Order affirmed, no costs.

Conlan and Schuchman, JJ., concur.

Ordered affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.