City of New York Municipal Court, 1896

Hutkoff v. Gorman

Hutkoff v. Gorman
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1896
18 Misc. 735

Counsel

H. Joseph, for appellant., D. Leventritt, for respondents.

Hutkoff v. Gorman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from must he affirmed, with costs.

The entire record and proceedings herein show that all the above persons named as defendants were actually defendants.

That they appeared at the trial and each one tried the issues raised by their respective pleadings.

Because of the result of such trial, a judgment was entered in favor of said defendants and each of them, and, therefore, the costs taxed herein were properly allowed and the judgment entered was right.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons and Sohuchman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.