City of New York Municipal Court, 1896

Peetsch v. Quinn

Peetsch v. Quinn
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided December 15, 1896 · Fitzsimons
18 Misc. 748; 42 N.Y.S. 1130

Counsel

Johnston & Johnston, for appellant., M. Curran, for respondent.

Peetsch v. Quinn

Opinion of the Court

Fitzsimons, J.

We think that the proceeding herein against Curran was a special proceeding, and as costs were therein awarded Curran, he. had the right to examine the plaintiff under the order granted herein.

Plaintiff having failed to pay such costs, the remedy, so taken, in our judgment, was not objectionable merely because it was retroactive.

The order must be affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck, Ch. J., and O’Dwyer, J., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.