City of New York Municipal Court, 1896

Hutkoff v. Gorman

Hutkoff v. Gorman
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 30, 1896
41 N.Y.S. 1119; 75 N.Y. St. Rep. 1490 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

See 39 N. Y. Supp. 1126., H. Joseph, for appellant., D. Leventritt, for respondent.

Hutkoff v. Gorman

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs. The entire record and proceedings herein show that all the above persons named as defendants were actually defendants; that they appeared at the trial, and each one tried the issues raised by their respective pleadings. Because of the result of such trial, a judgment was entered in favor of said defendants, and each of them,. and therefore the costs taxed herein were properly allowed, and the judgment entered was right. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.