City of New York Municipal Court, 1896

Mayer v. Bruns

Mayer v. Bruns
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided January 28, 1896 · Fitzsimons
73 N.Y. St. Rep. 513

Counsel

GK Waterbury, for app’lt; Donald McLean, for resp’t,

Mayer v. Bruns

Opinion of the Court

FITZSIMONS, J.

The order appealed from must be affirmed, -with costs, for the reason stated in the opinion of the special term *514justice. Besides, it is undisputed that the motion was not made by the plaintiff’s, attorney of record.

All concur.

The following opinion was rendered at special term by Mr. Justice CONLAN:

“The complaint shows on its face that the action was not commenced within six years, and the answer pleads the statute of limitations. I see no reason for bringing in the administrator. Motion denied.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.