City of New York Municipal Court, 1896

Troy Carriage Works v. Muxlow

Troy Carriage Works v. Muxlow
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided January 28, 1896 · Pee
73 N.Y. St. Rep. 612

Counsel

Thomson & Allen (James J. Allen, of counsel), for app’lt; W. H. Newman, for resp’t.

Troy Carriage Works v. Muxlow

Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

— The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of the special terrp justice who made said order. «

The following opinion was rendered at special term by Mr. J us tico BOTTY:

*613“The proceedings were, adjourned, not for the continuance of the examination of any surety which had been commenced, but to enable the defendant to procure the attendance of his sureties, or substitute new sureties and have them present for examination. Motion is therefore denied, but the new sureties must attend for justification on two days’ notice after service of notice of demand for such justification by plaintiff’s attorney.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.