City of New York Municipal Court, 1897

Jacob v. E. V. Cranfall Co.

Jacob v. E. V. Cranfall Co.
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided April 15, 1897
20 Misc. 716; 45 N.Y.S. 1142

Counsel

Herman Herst, for appellant., William King Hall, .for respondent.

Jacob v. E. V. Cranfall Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The sole question in dispute herein is: Did the-plaintiff perform the duties required from him by virtue- of his contract with the defendant? That question of fact, in our opinion, was properly submitted, to the jury and the evidence fully justifies their finding in plaintiff’s favor and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs. :

Present: Yaw Wyck, Ch. J,., McCarthy and Eitzsimows, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.