City of New York Municipal Court, 1897

Eleventh Ward Bank v. Heather

Eleventh Ward Bank v. Heather
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1897
21 Misc. 539; 47 N.Y.S. 718

Counsel

G. S. P. Stillman, for appellant., Adams & Adams, for respondents.

Eleventh Ward Bank v. Heather

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

An order was obtained against the judgment debtor herein in supplementary proceedings for his examination. At the time it was granted he was seized and in possession of certain real estate in this city. Upon motion, said order was vacated at Special Term because the judgment debtor; when the judgment was rendered, and the execution thereon was returned unsatisfied, and said order in' supplementary proceedings was issued; was the owner and seized in fee of real estate.

*540We think that the order appealed from must be affirmed. Globe Elec. Co. v. Sternfeld, N. Y. Law Journal, Jan. 7, 1897; Moyer v. Moyer, 7 App. Div. 528; Importers & Traders’ Nat. Bank v. Quackenbush, 143 N. Y. 567.

The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.