Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
City of New York Municipal Court, 1897

Dise v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Dise v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1897
21 Misc. 790; 47 N.Y.S. 1134

Counsel

Henry A. Robinson, for appellant., Manheim & Manheim, for respondent.

Dise v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There is a preponderance of evidence in plaintiff’s favor, proving that the injuries complained of were caused him, by reason of defendant’s negligence, and that he was not giiilty of contributory negligence.

The verdict of the jury in so finding must be sustained. No error, in- our opinion, was committed upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.