Rhodes v. Clark

The notice of dishonor s,ent to the appellant was sufficient. It was only necessary to notify him of the fact of the nonpayment of the notes in suit, within a reasonable time 'after the nonpayment.

Such notice was certainly given in this instance.

The evidence certainly sustains the verdict, and in our opinion preponderates in plaintiff’s favor, and, therefore, judgment is affirmed, with costsr

Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.