City of New York Municipal Court, 1898

Toal v. Soher

Toal v. Soher
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided February 15, 1898 · Fitzsimons
22 Misc. 765

Counsel

Hardy & Shellabarger, for appellant., William Hildreth Field & Deshon, for respondent.

Toal v. Soher

Opinion of the Court

Fitzsimons, Ch. J.

I think that the Special Term justice, upon the papers submitted to him herein, was justified in opening defendant’s default.

Such papers, in my opinion, ¡presented sufficient cause for so doing. The terms imposed, I think, were insufficient; in addition to such terms the plaintiff should have been 'allowed all disbursements incurred by her.

The order appealed from is modified to that extent, and as so modified, is affirmed, without costs.

Corlar, J., concurs.

Order modified, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.