City of New York Municipal Court, 1898

Terhune v. Dunn

Terhune v. Dunn
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided May 15, 1898
23 Misc. 600

Counsel

Franklin Bien, for appellant., Philip J. Britt, for respondent.

Terhune v. Dunn

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs. Jakobi v. Gorman, 2 Misc. Rep. 190; Hart v. Sexton, 11 id. 446; Ullman v. Gorman, 21 App. Div. 616; Rosenblum v. Gorman, 21 id. 618.

Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., Conlax and Sohuchman, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.