City of New York Municipal Court, 1898

McKeown v. Bank for Savings

McKeown v. Bank for Savings
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided December 15, 1898 · Scotchman
25 Misc. 797

Counsel

T. M. Tyng, for appellant., Strong & Cadwalader (Henry S. Wardner, of counsel), for respondent.

McKeown v. Bank for Savings

Opinion of the Court

Scotchman, J.

Under the authority of Mahro v. Greenwich Savings Bank, 16 Misc. Rep. 537, the order appealed from is right and is affirmed, with costs.

Olcott, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.