City of New York Municipal Court, 1898

Terhune v. Dunn

Terhune v. Dunn
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided May 27, 1898 · Cubiam
51 N.Y.S. 1122 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Franklin Bien, for appellant., Philip J. Britt, for respondent.

Terhune v. Dunn

Opinion of the Court

PEE CUBIAM.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.. Jakobi v. Gorman, 2 Misc. Rep. 190, 21 N. Y. Supp. 762; Hart v. Sexton, 11 Misc. Rep. 446, 32 N. Y. Supp. 222; Ullman v. Gorman, 21 App. Div. 616, 47 N. Y. Supp. 756; Rosenblum v. Gorman, 21 App. Div. 618, 47 N. Y. Supp. 754.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.