McKeown v. Bank for Savings
McKeown v. Bank for Savings
54 N.Y.S. 1106
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
Under the authority of Mahro v. Bank, 16 Misc. Rep. 537, 40 N. Y. Supp. 29, the order appealed from is right, and is affirmed, with costs. OLCOTT, J., concurs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.